I'm probably using the \starttable incorrectly:
with this code I only get only *one* horizontal line in the header
\starttable[|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|l|r|r|r|r|][bodyfont=9pt]
\NC step\NC frac\NC ival\NC \NC\Use{4}[cI]{freq
(Hz)}\NC~\NC\Use{4}[cI]{wavelength (m)}\AR
\NC\DC\DC\DC\DL[4]\DL[4]\AR
\NC 0
of a circle with radius /r/, being /r/ the thickness of
the paper times the amount of physical signatures. Something like:
\frac{π \times t \times s}{2}. I have not tried a formula for more
folds in a signature.
The thing is, you have to recalculate for each signature fold. The
innermost will have
in a
signature (only one fold in the middle) usually is 1/2 the circumference of
a circle with radius *r*, being *r* the thickness of the paper times the
amount of physical signatures. Something like: \frac{π \times t \times
s}{2}. I have not tried a formula for more folds in a signature.
The thing is, you
can I improve
> this ?
> > Thanks
> > Fabrice
> >
> > \m{ \forall n \in N, z_{n+1}=\frac{i}{3}z_n}
>
> you could try something like (here with too small numbers only to show...)
>
> \mapfontsize[modern][script] [.4]
> \mapfontsize[modern][scriptscript][.2
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 3:17 PM Fabrice Couvreur
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> To type my lessons or other, I use the Modern font in 12 pt or 11 pt. I find
> that the subscript notations are a little too big : how can I improve this ?
> Thanks
> Fabrice
>
> \m{ \forall n \in N
Hi,
To type my lessons or other, I use the Modern font in 12 pt or 11 pt. I
find that the subscript notations are a little too big : how can I improve
this ?
Thanks
Fabrice
\m{ \forall n \in N, z_{n+1}=\frac{i}{3}z_n
b am 09.12.2023 um 17:19:
>>>
>>> Very clear !
>>> In typography for Mathematics books, what choice should we make for the
>>> best possible result ?
>>>
>>> A question better answered by Mikael or Aditya!
>> Thank you for your trust
answered by Mikael or Aditya!
Thank you for your trust, Wolfgang. I am not sure I have something
valuable to say in addition to Adityas suggestion \frac{1/3} in inline
math. In any case, I attach a passage, with suggestions inspired by
Lansburgh's book (iin Swedish). Not sure the file size makes
On 12/9/2023 4:33 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sat, 9 Dec 2023, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
\starttext
\startlines
\type{\frac{1}{3}}: \m{\frac{1}{3}}
\type{\xfrac{1}{3}}: \m{\xfrac{1}{3}}
\type{\xxfrac{1}{3}}: \m{\xxfrac{1}{3}}
\type{\tfrac{1}{3}}: \m{\tfrac{1}{3}}
\type{\sfrac{1}{3}}: \m
On Sat, 9 Dec 2023, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> \starttext
>
> \startlines
> \type{\frac{1}{3}}: \m{\frac{1}{3}}
> \type{\xfrac{1}{3}}: \m{\xfrac{1}{3}}
> \type{\xxfrac{1}{3}}: \m{\xxfrac{1}{3}}
> \type{\tfrac{1}{3}}: \m{\tfrac{1}{3}}
> \type{\sfrac{1}{3}}: \m{\sfrac{1
Fabrice Couvreur schrieb am 09.12.2023 um 16:13:
Hi Wolfgang,
I'm reading this thread and I'm interested because I type a lot of
text with mathematical formulas.
In fact, I find that \dfrac{} creates unsightly leading space and that
\frac{} is too small. What is the difference between \frac
Hi Wolfgang,
I'm reading this thread and I'm interested because I type a lot of text
with mathematical formulas.
In fact, I find that \dfrac{} creates unsightly leading space and that
\frac{} is too small. What is the difference between \frac{} and \tfrac{} ?
Fabrice
Le sam. 9 déc. 2023 à 14:00
Am 09.12.23 um 14:43 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
anton.chig...@mail.com schrieb am 09.12.2023 um 14:15:
\startlines
\type{\frac{1}{3}}: \m{\frac{1}{3}}
\type{\xfrac{1}{3}}: \m{\xfrac{1}{3}}
\type{\xxfrac{1}{3}}: \m{\xxfrac{1}{3}}
\type{\tfrac{1}{3}}: \m{\tfrac{1}{3}}
\type{\sfrac{1}{3}}: \m
anton.chig...@mail.com schrieb am 09.12.2023 um 14:15:
I worked, ;-), thanks.
Let me ask you another thing, how can I avoid messing up the
line spacing by using \sqrt and \frac, the line that follows these has increased
line spacing in the pdf output
code:
Find the normal and shearing stresses
I worked, ;-), thanks.
Let me ask you another thing, how can I avoid messing up the
line spacing by using \sqrt and \frac, the line that follows these has increased
line spacing in the pdf output
code:
Find the normal and shearing stresses on an oblique plane defined by
$l=\sqrt{\frac{3}{13
\enablemathautospacing % more global
% \enablemathautofencing % more global
\enablemathautonumbers % more global
% \autofences % more local
\usemodule[ipsum]
\starttext
\ipsum
\stoptext
And I attach the two files to setup the font.
no math ... anyway
\showglyphs
\dorecurse{100}{test \im{\frac
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 01:16:15PM +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> > \starttext
> > Hello world!
> > \startformula
> > X(f) = \startcases[align={right,left},distance=3pt]
> > \NC T, \NC{} $|f| < \frac{1}{2T}$ \NR
> > \NC 0, \NC{} $|f|
+dfsg-2, several math
features seem to break for me. Here is an example:
\starttext
Hello world!
\startformula
X(f) = \startcases[align={right,left},distance=3pt]
\NC T, \NC{} $|f| < \frac{1}{2T}$ \NR
\NC 0, \NC{} $|f| \geq \frac{1}{2T}$ \NR
\stopcases
\stopformula
\stoptext
There
. Here is an example:
\starttext
Hello world!
\startformula
X(f) = \startcases[align={right,left},distance=3pt]
\NC T, \NC{} $|f| < \frac{1}{2T}$ \NR
\NC 0, \NC{} $|f| \geq \frac{1}{2T}$ \NR
\stopcases
\stopformula
\stoptext
The above works very well in 2021.03.05.20230120+dfsg-1+deb1
with math notation) and to compute the
> trigonometric function leading to sin(pi/4) = 1/2, or cos(pi/6) = sqrt(3)/2
> and display it in math mode.
You can use templates to subtitute values into a string and then send that out
to be typeset.
For example: if you want to turn "sin(pi/4) = 1/2"
- \frac{5}{12})^2 - \frac{1}{24}}
\stopitem
\startitem
\m{-3(x - \frac{1}{3})^2 + \frac{1}{3}}
\stopitem
\startitem
\m{7(x + \frac{5}{14})^2 + \frac{199}{28}}
\stopitem
\startitem
\m{-\frac{1}{2}(x + 2)^2 + \frac{9}{2}}
\stopitem
(nesting, trial mode etc), think of
\bTABLE \bTR \bTD
\startitemize[a]
\startitem
\im{\sqrt{\frac{1}{x^4}}}
\stopitem
\startitem
\startitemize[n]
\startitem
\im{\sqrt{\frac{1}{x^4}}}
\stopitem
\startitem
\im{\sqrt{\frac{1}{x^4}}}
\stopitem
\stopitemize
(nesting, trial mode etc), think of
\bTABLE \bTR \bTD
\startitemize[a]
\startitem
\im{\sqrt{\frac{1}{x^4}}}
\stopitem
\startitem
\startitemize[n]
\startitem
\im{\sqrt{\frac{1}{x^4}}}
\stopitem
\startitem
\im{\sqrt{\frac{1}{x^4}}}
\stopitem
\stopitemize
; james-tanton-web}.
> \placeformula[eq:james-tanton-canvi-de-variables]
> \startformula
> \startalign
> \NC ax^2 + bx + c = 0 \NC \NR
> \NC ax^2 + bx = -c \NC \quad \text{transposem } c\NR
> \NC x^2 + \frac{b}{a} x = - \frac{c}{a} \NC \quad \text{dividim per }a\NR
> \NC x \left( x + \frac{
ax^2 + bx + c = 0 \NC \NR
\NC ax^2 + bx = -c \NC \quad \text{transposem } c\NR
\NC x^2 + \frac{b}{a} x = - \frac{c}{a} \NC \quad \text{dividim per }a\NR
\NC x \left( x + \frac{b}{a} \right) = - \frac{c}{a} \NC \quad
\text{factoritzam} \NR
\NC (k-D)(k+D) = - \frac{c}{a} \NC \quad \text{canvi de
x);
max_y := max(max_y, y);
min_x := min(min_x, x);
min_y := min(min_y, y);
endfor
begin_sketch
use_tile (t, min_x, min_y, max_x-min_x, max_y-min_y);
clip currentpicture to p;
end_sketch;
use_sketch;
enddef;
vardef drawtile (suffix t) (expr p) =
tile (t, p);
cdraw p
endd
cm] (-1.4,-1.4) grid (1.4,1.4);
\draw (0,0) circle (1cm);
\draw[->] (-1.5,0) -- (1.5,0) node[right] {$x$} coordinate(x
axis);
\draw[->] (0,-1.5) -- (0,1.5) node[above] {$y$} coordinate(y
axis);
\foreach \x/\xtext in {-1, -.5/-\frac{1
cking the new binary. (Thanks, Günter!)
The x86_64-darwinlegacy from that download link version has fixed the problem
on the Mac. Thank-you all involved.
\starttext
\startformula
v = \frac{1.32}{1.41} = 0.935
\stopformula
\stoptext
gives the attached.
—
via ntg-context wrote:
>>>> Hi List,
>>>> I’m getting strange spaces around some decimal points after a clean
>>>> LMTX
>>>> install. MWE:
>>>> \starttext
>>>> \startformula
>>>> v = \frac{1.32}{1.41
t;> Hi List,
>>> I’m getting strange spaces around some decimal points after a clean
>>> LMTX
>>> install. MWE:
>>> \starttext
>>> \startformula
>>> v = \frac{1.32}{1.41} = 0.935
>>> \stopformula
>>> \stoptext
>>>
:
Hi List,
I’m getting strange spaces around some decimal points after a
clean LMTX
install. MWE:
\starttext
\startformula
v = \frac{1.32}{1.41} = 0.935
\stopformula
\stoptext
This produces the result attached below. The 1.32 looks fine,
but the next two
numbers have excess space around
On 3/26/2023 4:20 AM, Gavin via ntg-context wrote:
Hi List,
I’m getting strange spaces around some decimal points after a clean LMTX
install. MWE:
\starttext
\startformula
v = \frac{1.32}{1.41} = 0.935
\stopformula
\stoptext
This produces the result attached below. The 1.32 looks
On 3/26/2023 4:20 AM, Gavin via ntg-context wrote:
Hi List,
I’m getting strange spaces around some decimal points after a clean LMTX
install. MWE:
\starttext
\startformula
v = \frac{1.32}{1.41} = 0.935
\stopformula
\stoptext
This produces the result attached below. The 1.32 looks
es]
>
> \starttext
> \startformula
> \abs{v} = \frac{1.32}{1.41} = 0.935
> \stopformula
> \stoptext
>
> This causes an error, complaining that \abs is undefined. However, workes
> fine with
>
> ConTeXt ver: 2023.02.07 19:06 LMTX fmt: 2023.3.14 int: english/englis
Hi List,
The command \definemathfence seems to not be working as it did in other recent
LMTX. MWE:
\definemathfence[abs][bar][command=yes]
\starttext
\startformula
\abs{v} = \frac{1.32}{1.41} = 0.935
\stopformula
\stoptext
This causes an error, complaining that \abs is undefined
Hi List,
I’m getting strange spaces around some decimal points after a clean LMTX
install. MWE:
\starttext
\startformula
v = \frac{1.32}{1.41} = 0.935
\stopformula
\stoptext
This produces the result attached below. The 1.32 looks fine, but the next two
numbers have excess space around
Hello Alexandre, thank you so much, this is precisely what I was looking for!
Cheers
Willi
> On 25 Mar 2023, at 18:28, Alexandre Christe via ntg-context
> wrote:
>
> Hi Willi,
>
> A dead simple solution would be
>
> \starttext
> \startformula
> {\f
Hi Willi,
A dead simple solution would be
\starttext
\startformula
{\frac{47 \times 62}{44 \times 56}} \times {12} \qquad \rm{or} \qquad
{{\frac{47 \times 62 \times 12}{44 \timess 56}}=14.2 \rm kilo}
\stopformula
\stoptext
Le sam. 25 mars 2023 à 18:09, Willi Egger via ntg-context <
.
In the setup of book there would be enough place, if I coud decrease the space
left and right of the ‘or’.
How can I achieve this?
Cheers
Willi
\starttext
\startformulas
\startformula[align=right]
{\frac{47 \times 62}{44 \times 56}} \times {12}
\stopformula
\startformula
\fenced[brace][size=3]{x_3} =
>\fenced[brace][size=4]{x_4} =
>\fenced[brace]{\blackrule[width=1cm,height=1cm]}
>}
>
>\im{
>\root[4]{1+x^2+a} +
>\frac{1}{1+x^2+a} +
>\overparent{1+x^2+a} +
>\overbrace{1+x^2+a
} =
\fenced[brace][size=3]{x_3} =
\fenced[brace][size=4]{x_4} =
\fenced[brace]{\blackrule[width=1cm,height=1cm]}
}
\im{
\root[4]{1+x^2+a} +
\frac{1}{1+x^2+a} +
\overparent{1+x^2+a} +
\overbrace{1+x^2+a} +
\overparent{x
2} \over {44 \times 56}}=14.2\ \rm kilo
>> \stopformula
>> \stopformulas
>> \stoptext
>> Thank you for hinting me how to this correctly.
>
> \frac{...}{...} .. forget about \over
>
> -
>
uped?
> — I tried also the grouping with bracis, which gives the same result.
> 2. Why is the result after the equalsign in the denominator?
>
> [...]
> Thank you for hinting me how to this correctly.
Have you tried using \fra
\times 12} \over {44 \times 56}}=14.2\ \rm kilo
\stopformula
\stopformulas
\stoptext
Thank you for hinting me how to this correctly.
\frac{...}{...} .. forget about \over
-
Hans Hagen
\startformula
\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}\dorecurse{15}{+\sqrt{\blackrule[width=10pt,height=#1pt,depth=#1pt,color=gray]}}
\stopformula
\startformula
\sqrt{\blackrule[width=10pt,height=100pt,depth=100pt,color=gray]}
\stopformula
\stoptext
It works in MKIV but it gives the following error in the latest LMTX
ded not to use this connector, producing unexpected results.
\startformula
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c1}{e}^{\dot\alpha}
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c2}{e}_{\mu}
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c3}{e}^{\beta} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
\bar\sigma^{\dot\alpha\beta}_{\mu}
\stopformula
\stopboxanchor
lts.
\startformula
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c1}{e}^{\dot\alpha}
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c2}{e}_{\mu}
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c3}{e}^{\beta} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
\bar\sigma^{\dot\alpha\beta}_{\mu}
\stopformula
\stopboxanchoring
\stoptext
anchors-002-copy.pdf
Description: Adobe
_{\mu}% <-- This works, without
accent
%\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c2}{\bar{e}}_{\mu} % <-- This does not work,
with accent
\bar{\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c2}{e}}_{\mu} % <-- This works, but
connector punches through accent
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c3}{e}^{\beta} = \f
distance=1ex,
myrulethickness=1pt,
rulecolor=darkred,
mp=mypos:boxanchor:bottom]{b2}{b4}
\startformula
\int_{\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{b2}0}^{\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{b1}\infty}
\frac{\dd x}{1 + x^2} =
\int_{\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{b4}0}^{\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{b3
\starttext
\startboxanchoring[+]
\connectboxanchors[top][top][distance=1ex,arrow=no] {c1}{c2}
\connectboxanchors[bottom] [bottom] [distance=1ex,arrow=no] {c2}{c3}
\startformula
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c1}{e}_{\alpha}
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c2}{e}^{\mu}
\mathboxanchor
=1ex] {d1}{d2}
\startformula
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c1}{e}_{\alpha}
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{c2}{e}^{\mu}
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{d1}{todo}
\mathboxanchored[nucleus]{d2}{e}_{\dot{\beta}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
\sigma_{\alpha,\dot{\beta}}^{\mu}
\stopformula
\stopboxanchoring
$
\connectboxanchors[top][top]{one}{two}
x + \frac[source=\namedboxanchor{one}]{1+x}{2-x} =
z + \frac[source=\namedboxanchor{two}]{1+x^2}{2-x^3}
$
\input ward
\connectboxanchors[top][top]{one}{two}
So how about
$
x + \frac[source=\namedboxanchor{one}]{1+x}{2-x}
$
and
$
z + \frac
cpsp Capital Spacing
dlig Discretionary Ligatures
frac Fractions
hlig Historical Ligatures
kern Kerning
liga Standard Ligatures
lnum Lining Figures
mark Mark Positioning
mkmk Mark to Mark Positioning
onum Oldstyle Figures
pnum Proportional Figures
salt Stylistic
with otfinfo in the terminal. For example:
iMac:~ voss$ otfinfo -f `kpsewhich LibertinusSerif-Regular.otf`
c2sc Small Capitals From Capitals
calt Contextual Alternates
case Case-Sensitive Forms
ccmp Glyph Composition/Decomposition
cpsp Capital Spacing
dlig Discretionary Ligatures
frac
ed,
> align={1:right,2:left,3:left},
> strut=yes,
> ]
>
> \starttext
>
> \placeformula
> \startformula
> \startpdeproblem
> \NC - \Delta u \NC = 0 \NC \qquad\text{in } \Omega \NR
> \NC \frac{\partial u}{\partial {\bi n}} \NC = V u + \phi \NC
> \qquad\text{on } \p
commands such as \dm.
>
> We’ll see what Hans and Mikael say.
>
> Best regards: OK
>
> On 2 Nov 2022, at 12:53, Jeong Dal via ntg-context wrote:
>
> Dear Otared,
>
>
> I think there is an issue with the size of math fonts in \frac when used in
> math alignm
ong Dal via ntg-context wrote:
>
> Dear Otared,
>
>>
>> I think there is an issue with the size of math fonts in \frac when used in
>> math alignments, as it is is shown in the following example.
>>
>
> I confirm what you said.
>
> However, if I
Dear Otared,
>
> I think there is an issue with the size of math fonts in \frac when used in
> math alignments, as it is is shown in the following example.
>
I confirm what you said.
However, if I use \dm{} instead of \displaystyle as following, then the output
is correct.
\
Hi Hans and Mikael,
I think there is an issue with the size of math fonts in \frac when used in
math alignments, as it is is shown in the following example.
%% begin bug-mathalignment.tex
\definemathmatrix[alignedcases]
[align={1:right,2:left,3:left},
distance=3pt,
left
, columns, two, nowhite, after]
\item\hspace[big] $\frac{d}{dx} x^2$
This is where the solution should be. Text answers look fine, but formulas have
too much space above, below and between lines\dots.
\item\hspace[big] $\frac{d}{dx}\left( x^3 + 2x \right)$
\item\hspace[big] $\frac{d}{dx}\left( x^{-2
lumns,joinedup] [n=3,grid=line]
> \item $ 56 + 2 \cdot 3 $
> \item $ 5-(7) $
> \item $ \frac{21}{7} $
> \stopitemize
>
> \stoptext
>
> Could be that there is a better way.
>
> Le jeu. 22 sept. 2022 à 12:57, Jan-Erik Hägglöf via ntg-context
> mailto:ntg-context@
Hi Jan-Erik,
One way I came across searching the mailing list is the following:
\starttext
\startitemize [a,columns,joinedup] [n=3,grid=line]
\item $ 56 + 2 \cdot 3 $
\item $ 5-(7) $
\item $ \frac{21}{7} $
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Could be that there is a *better* way.
Le jeu. 22 sept. 2022 à
\startitemize[a,columns,three]\item $ 56 + 2 \cdot 3 $\item $ 5-(7) $\item $ \frac{21}{7} $\stopitemize\stoptextThanks in advanceJan-Erik
result.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
If your question is of interest to others
\enablemathautonumbers % more global
\autofences% more local
\startTEXpage [offset=1dk]
% $|x| + |3|$
% $ x \middle | \frac{a}{x}$
% $ x | \frac{a}{x}$
% $ ( \frac{a}{x} + b | x )$
$ ( \frac{a}{x} + b | x )$
$ ( \frac{a}{x} + b || x )$
$ ( \frac{a}{x} + b ||| x )$
$ ( \frac{a}{x} + b
is that
$ \autofences x | \frac{a}{x}$
$ \autofences ( \frac{a}{x} + b | x )$
should also work (lone middles)
Le jeu. 25 août 2022 à 18:18, Hans Hagen via ntg-context
mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>> a écrit :
Hi,
I uploaded a new lmtx. Again some updated math of which details will be
revealed
{\setmscale{1500}} % {\setmscale{1.5}}
\startformula a=b^2 + \sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{x}} \stopformula
\startformula \mx a=b^2 + \sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{x}} \stopformula
\startformula \mxx a=b^2 + \sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{x}} \stopformula
\startformula \TinyMath a=b^2 + \sqrt[3]{\frac
, where it becomes a fraction atom) and when you compare
{{a}\over{y}}
\frac{a}{b}
you even save two keystrokes -)
it's also not easy to control spacing etc because one cannot redefine
over; actually fractions uses \U[..over|above|..] which takes two
arguments (forward scanning)
It seems
t but
>> with lmtx the font under the square root is smaller.
>> Thank you
>> Fabrice
>>
>> \protected\def\exp{\text{\normal exp}}
>>
>> \starttext
>> \startformula
>>\sqrt{\exp(x)}=\exp\left(\frac{x}{2}\right).
>> \stopformula
>
er the square root is smaller.
> >> Thank you
> >> Fabrice
> >>
> >> \protected\def\exp{\text{\normal exp}}
> >>
> >> \starttext
> >> \startformula
> >>\sqrt{\exp(x)}=\exp\left(\frac{x}{2}\right).
> >> \stopform
Couvreur via
ntg-context
wrote:
Hello,
If I compile with context the expected result is correct but
with lmtx the font under the square root is smaller.
Thank you
Fabrice
\protected\def\exp{\text{\normal exp}}
\starttext
\startformula
\sqrt{\exp(x)}=\exp\left(\frac{x}{2}\right).
\stopformula
pile with context the expected result is correct but with lmtx
> the font under the square root is smaller.
> > Thank you
> > Fabrice
> >
> > \protected\def\exp{\text{\normal exp}}
> >
> > \starttext
> > \startformula
> >\sqrt{\exp(x)}=\exp
mal exp}}
>
> \starttext
> \startformula
>\sqrt{\exp(x)}=\exp\left(\frac{x}{2}\right).
> \stopformula
> \stoptext
Hi,
without your redefinition of \exp it looks fine (exp is already
defined). Does that solve your problem, or are you doing something
else, and t
Hello,
If I compile with context the expected result is correct but with lmtx the
font under the square root is smaller.
Thank you
Fabrice
\protected\def\exp{\text{\normal exp}}
\starttext
\startformula
\sqrt{\exp(x)}=\exp\left(\frac{x}{2}\right).
\stopformula
\stoptext
to the parameter
FractionNumeratorDisplayStyleShiftUp in lm.lfg. If you always set it
to 600, it seems to work also for luatex. (This will be fixed.)
Another thing: Instead of using \over, I suggest that you use \frac
(less surprises). Something like:
\starttext
\startformula
a=b + 1
\stopformula
g. If you always set it
> to 600, it seems to work also for luatex. (This will be fixed.)
>
> Another thing: Instead of using \over, I suggest that you use \frac
> (less surprises). Something like:
>
> \starttext
> \startformula
> a=b + 1
> \stopformula
>
>
The strange thing with fractions seems to be due to the parameter
FractionNumeratorDisplayStyleShiftUp in lm.lfg. If you always set it
to 600, it seems to work also for luatex. (This will be fixed.)
Another thing: Instead of using \ov
\starttext
\startchapter [title={Mill}]
\dorecurse{7}{\samplefile{lorem}}
\stopchapter
\startchapter [title={Hacker}]
\dorecurse{11}{\samplefile{lorem}}
\stopchapter
\startchapter [title={cow}]
\dorecurse{7}{\samplefile{lorem}}
\stopchapter
\stoptext
\setupbodyfont[termes]
\starttext
pla
It seems that putting \column before itemize of 'c', forces 'c' together with
this content. Repeating this step produces what I want:
\startexercici[exercici:operacions-amb-fraccions-2]{multiplicació i divisió}
Opereu:
\startitemize[a, columns, three]
\item \startformula 3 \cdot \frac{5}{3
fraccions}
\subject{Preguntes}
\startexercici[exercici:operacions-amb-fraccions-1]{suma i resta} Opereu:
\startitemize[a, columns, three]
\item \startformula \frac{2}{7} + \frac{6}{7} - \frac{1}{7} \stopformula
\item \startformula \frac{5}{8} + \frac{9}{8} \stopformula
\item \startformula \frac{1}{4
, open, close, punct, inner (and some that we need not to
think about)).
So far, Hans has implemented frac and rad for fractions and radicals.
The fractions has been a funny construction, being put inside empty
delimiters, and so surrounded by the \nulldelimiterspace (which has
been set to 1.2pt
)).
So far, Hans has implemented frac and rad for fractions and radicals.
The fractions has been a funny construction, being put inside empty
delimiters, and so surrounded by the \nulldelimiterspace (which has
been set to 1.2pt, independent of font size). Now we have better
control of the spacing
\mathlist
5:7: ...\mathord
5:7: \nucleus
5:7: .\mathchar (fam="0,char="61)
5:7: ...\mathbin
5:7: \nucleus
5:7: .\mathchar (fam="0,char="2B)
5:7: ...\mathord
5:7: \nucleus
5:7: .\mathchar (fam="0,char="62)
i'll upload a fixed version
fwiw: \
>> -
>>> \setupbodyfont[stixtwo]
>>> \starttext
>>>
>>> Test ß 1lIjJuQ \% § \& ?! VERSAL-ẞ- \|> --- 1234567890 --- //
>>>
>>> \placeformula[eqn:def-m]
>>> \startformula
>>> m = \frac{m_0}{\sqrt{1-\frac
):
-
\setupbodyfont[stixtwo]
\starttext
Test ß 1lIjJuQ \% § \& ?! VERSAL-ẞ- \|> --- 1234567890 --- //
\placeformula[eqn:def-m]
\startformula
m = \frac{m_0}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}
\stopformula
\stoptext
-
Unfortunately the compiler throws an error — why is there a check of
XKCD}[url(https://xkcd.com/2034/)]}...}
... of Kinematics:
\startformula E = K_0t + \frac{1}{2}\rho vt^2 \stopformula
% ? Should it be v or \nu?
... of Number Theory:
\startformula K_\Lambda =
\sum^\infty_{i=0}\sum^\infty_{\pi=0}(n-\pi)(i+e^{\pi-\infty})\stopformula
... of Fluid Dynamics:
\sta
fontforge, which
creates the GPOS table automatically, added the liga table
manually, and generated an OTF font file.
Is there a way to automate this (possibly a fontforge
script)? The script should also find the ligatures (there
may also be frac substitutions). Or is there another way
which leaves
table
manually, and generated an OTF font file.
Is there a way to automate this (possibly a fontforge
script)? The script should also find the ligatures (there
may also be frac substitutions). Or is there another way
which leaves the files unchanged?
2. Selecting glyphs from multiple font files
\gamma x) dx = \lim Z → ∞
\stopformula
\egroup
\startformula
\sqrt{34×y\frac{21\alpha^2}{98.0 x_2}}Δθ = \sin(a)^2 + \cos(b)^2
\stopformula
\bgroup\bf
\startformula
\sqrt{34×y\frac{21\alpha^2}{98.0 x_2}}Δθ = \sin(a)^2 + \cos(b)^2
\stopformula
\egroup
\stoptext
\
R_{3 y}\\
R_{4 x}\\
R_{4 y}
\end{matrix}
\right]
=
\left[
\begin{matrix}
\frac{A_{1} E_{1}}{L_{1}} & 0 & - \frac{A_{1} E_{1}}{L_{1}} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
- \frac{A_{1
Dear Sylvain,
I am using ’\startalign’
>
> \starttext
> \startformula
> \eqalign{
> ax^2+bx+c &= 0 \cr
> x &= \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a} \cr
> }
> \stopformula
> \stoptext
>
\starttext
\startformula
\startalign
\NC ax^2 + bx + c \NC = 0 \NR
\NC x \
Sylvain Hubert via ntg-context schrieb am 07.09.2021 um 14:29:
Dear List,
The following example of equation alignment copied from An Excursion
is not reproducible under my context 2021.03.05 shipped with texlive
2021:
\starttext
\startformula
\eqalign{
ax^2+bx+c &= 0 \cr
x &= \fra
Dear List,
The following example of equation alignment copied from An Excursion
is not reproducible under my context 2021.03.05 shipped with texlive
2021:
\starttext
\startformula
\eqalign{
ax^2+bx+c &= 0 \cr
x &= \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a} \cr
}
\stopformula
\stoptext
Both am
= 1, 98, 1 do
context(lorum)
end
\stopluacode
\startformula \startmathalignment[n=1]
\NC y = ax \NR
\NC a^2 + b^2 = c^2 \NR
\NC x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a} \NR
\stopmathalignment \stopformula
\stopcolumns \stoptext
Adding text after the formula seems to fix the issue, but that mea
On 7/8/2021 9:46 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi all,
is it possible to subtract a featureset that has been applied to a
fontfamily? MWE:
\definefontfeature
[f:frac]
[frac=yes,onum=no,pnum=no]
\definefontfeature
[f:onum]
[onum=yes,pnum=yes]
\definefontfamily [test] [serif
Hi all,
is it possible to subtract a featureset that has been applied to a
fontfamily? MWE:
\definefontfeature
[f:frac]
[frac=yes,onum=no,pnum=no]
\definefontfeature
[f:onum]
[onum=yes,pnum=yes]
\definefontfamily [test] [serif] [AntykwaTorunska] [features=f:onum]
\definefontfamily
ic one here (it is needed(?) in the Neo Euler case to
>> have function names set upright). The following file shows the problem
>> as well:
>> %%%
>> \setupmathematics[
>> functionstyle=normal,
>> ]
>> \starttext
>> We have $\cos\alpha$, $\sin\alpha$, $
[
functionstyle=normal,
]
\starttext
We have $\cos\alpha$, $\sin\alpha$, $\tan\alpha$,
\startformula
\cos\alpha=\frac{a}{c},\quad
\sin\alpha=\frac{b}{c},\quad
\tan\alpha=\frac{\sin\alpha}{\cos\alpha}=\frac{b}{a}.
\stopformula
\stoptext
%%%
I had a backup of the file I was working on, and the problem
$, $\sin\alpha$, $\tan\alpha$,
\startformula
\cos\alpha=\frac{a}{c},\quad
\sin\alpha=\frac{b}{c},\quad
\tan\alpha=\frac{\sin\alpha}{\cos\alpha}=\frac{b}{a}.
\stopformula
\stoptext
%%%
I had a backup of the file I was working on, and the problem was not
present on june 13 (not sure I had a completely
9:39 AM, thierry horsin wrote:
For instance:
\switchtobodyfont[21pt]
\startformula
\frac{MTC}{MTE}
\stopformula
is OK.
While
\switchtobodyfont[22pt]
\startformula
\frac{MTC}{MTE}
\stopformula
gives an error
but
\switchtobodyfont[22pt]
$\frac{MTC}{MTE}$ works fine.
Thanks
Below: part
On 4/19/2021 9:39 AM, thierry horsin wrote:
For instance:
\switchtobodyfont[21pt]
\startformula
\frac{MTC}{MTE}
\stopformula
is OK.
While
\switchtobodyfont[22pt]
\startformula
\frac{MTC}{MTE}
\stopformula
gives an error
but
\switchtobodyfont[22pt]
$\frac{MTC}{MTE}$ works fine.
Thanks
1 - 100 of 711 matches
Mail list logo
